Publishers Score Google's Ad Tech Remedies 5/10
Publishers and sell-side executives gave a mixed scorecard, averaging 5/10, to the remedies proposed in the DOJ's antitrust case against Google's ad tech dominance. They acknowledge progress, particularly in opening AdX to rival ad servers and banning first-look advantages, but express skepticism about practical impact and enforcement. The opening of AdX to non-Google ad servers received the highest average score (6/10), seen as a potential shift, though caveats remain about Google's own demand participation. Other remedies, like data portability and unbundling AdX/DFP, scored lower, seen as transparency or billing changes rather than true competitive resets. Concerns persist about the hollowed-out alternative ad server market and risks for publishers switching stacks.
- •Seven publisher revenue and sell-side executives rated Google's ad tech remedies, assigning an average total score of 5/10.
- •The remedy to open AdX bidding to rival ad servers received the highest average score of 6/10.
- •A ban on Google's 'first look' and 'last look' auction advantages scored 6/10, though Google claims it already stopped these practices in 2019.
