Data Provider / Broker · vs · B2C Consumer App / Platform
Wappalyzer vs Weedmaps
Structured technology and market comparison · 2026
Direct Feature Comparison
Wappalyzer · vs · WeedmapsTechnographic intelligence platform for B2B prospecting and enrichment.
Cannabis marketplace and SaaS advertising platform for dispensaries and brands.
Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Wappalyzer and Weedmaps
Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.
Comparison Analysis
What is the main difference between Wappalyzer and Weedmaps?
When comparing Wappalyzer and Weedmaps, both platforms operate within the Data Provider / Broker and B2C Consumer App / Platform ecosystem. Wappalyzer is positioned as Technographic intelligence platform for B2B prospecting and enrichment, whereas Weedmaps focuses on Cannabis marketplace and SaaS advertising platform for dispensaries and brands. Decision-makers evaluate both solutions when orchestrating their commercial monetization and technology stack.
What are the top alternatives to Wappalyzer and Weedmaps?
When evaluating Wappalyzer and Weedmaps, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Data Provider / Broker and B2C Consumer App / Platform. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.
Market Signals
Recent Market Signals & Activity: Wappalyzer vs Weedmaps
Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.
Wappalyzer
Recent Signals
No recent market signals documented for Wappalyzer in the current tracking window.
Weedmaps
Recent Signals
- ·SEC APIfinancials
10-Q Financial Filing Analysis for Weedmaps (2026-08-06)
WM Technology, Inc. (Weedmaps) reported its Q2 2026 financial results, generating $42.45 million in revenue, a 5% decrease year-over-year from $44.85 million in Q2 2025. Net income improved to $2.88 million compared to $2.16 million in the prior-year period, primarily driven by a 7% reduction in total operating expenses to $40.09 million and the partial reversal of AWS purchase commitment loss contingencies. However, Adjusted EBITDA declined sharply by 58% to $4.97 million compared to $11.73 million in Q2 2025. Operationally, the company continues to face headwinds in its core California market and established regions due to customer margin compression, industry consolidation, and price deflation. Average monthly paying clients fell 4% YoY to 5,040, and average monthly revenue per paying client slipped to $2,807. During the quarter, the company completed its voluntary delisting from Nasdaq to the OTCQX market and settled major putative shareholder and derivative class actions for $7.5 million (mostly insurance-funded).
- Q2 2026 revenue fell 5.4% YoY to $42.45 million, while net income rose to $2.88 million ($0.02 EPS) and Adjusted EBITDA dropped 57.6% YoY to $4.97 million.
- Average monthly paying clients dropped 4% YoY to 5,040 with average monthly revenue per paying client decreasing to $2,807.
- Completed voluntary delisting from Nasdaq on April 24, 2026, transitioning trading of Class A Common Stock to the OTCQX Best Market under ticker MAPS.
Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.
Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Wappalyzer and Weedmaps share across the market ecosystem.
