LIPA

Publisher & Media Owner · vs · Publisher & Media Owner · B2C Consumer App / Platform

Lionsgate vs Paramount

Structured technology and market comparison · 2026

Direct Feature Comparison

Lionsgate · vs · Paramount
Market Cluster / Sector
LionsgatePublisher & Media Owner
ParamountPublisher & Media Owner · B2C Consumer App / Platform
Platform Focus
Lionsgate

Independent studio monetising entertainment IP across screens, audio, games and experiences.

Paramount

Media owner spanning streaming, TV networks and film studios.

Company Size
Lionsgate1,001–5,000 employees
ParamountUnknown
Headquarters
LionsgateUnited States
ParamountUnited States
Year Founded
Lionsgate1997
ParamountUnknown

Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Lionsgate and Paramount

Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.

Compare in PlatformInstant access · 1-click via Google/LinkedIn

Comparison Analysis

What is the main difference between Lionsgate and Paramount?

When comparing Lionsgate and Paramount, both platforms operate within the Video Streaming Platform, Connected TV (CTV) & OTT, and Publisher & Media Owner ecosystem. Lionsgate is positioned as Independent studio monetising entertainment IP across screens, audio, games and experiences, whereas Paramount focuses on Media owner spanning streaming, TV networks and film studios. Decision-makers evaluate both solutions when orchestrating their commercial monetization and technology stack.

What are the top alternatives to Lionsgate and Paramount?

When evaluating Lionsgate and Paramount, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Video Streaming Platform, Connected TV (CTV) & OTT, and Publisher & Media Owner. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.

How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Lionsgate and Paramount compare?

Lionsgate is headquartered in United States (founded in 1997) with 1,001–5,000 employees. Paramount is based in United States (founding year unrecorded) with Unknown. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.

Market Signals

Recent Market Signals & Activity: Lionsgate vs Paramount

Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.

LI

Lionsgate

Recent Signals

  • ·SEC APIfinancials

    8-K Financial Filing Analysis for Lionsgate (2026-10-29)

    On October 29, 2026, Starz Entertainment Corp. furnished a Form 8-K under Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition) announcing the release of its financial results for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2026. The announcement references an earnings press release issued concurrently and attached as Exhibit 99.1. The filing fulfills standard regulatory reporting requirements under Exchange Act Section 18 without disclosing detailed line-item financial figures in the body of the report.

    • Starz Entertainment Corp. announced its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2026, on October 29, 2026.
    • The full quarterly earnings release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference under Item 2.02.
    • The report was formally authorized and signed by Chief Financial Officer Scott Macdonald on October 29, 2026.
  • ·SEC APIfinancials

    10-Q Financial Filing Analysis for Lionsgate (2026-10-29)

    Starz Entertainment Corp. (formerly the Media Networks segment of Lionsgate prior to the May 2025 spin-off) reported its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2026. Consolidated revenue reached $322.4 million, up 0.5% year-over-year, supported by a 1.7% expansion in OTT streaming revenue to $226.6 million, which offset a 2.3% decline in linear subscription revenues. The company recorded an operating loss of $21.2 million and a net loss of $34.8 million ($2.02 per share), marking an improvement from a net loss of $52.6 million in Q3 2025. Profitability benefited from a $13.3 million reduction in restructuring costs (including an $11.1 million downward revision to post-pay-one film contract termination liabilities) and lower programming amortization, while depreciation and amortization rose to $67.4 million due to shortening the useful life of traditional MVPD affiliate relationship intangibles.

    • Total Q3 2026 revenue was $322.4 million ($226.6 million OTT, $95.8 million linear/other), yielding an operating loss of $21.2 million and net loss of $34.8 million ($2.02 per diluted share).
    • On August 12, 2026, Starz amended its credit facility to increase Term Loan A principal from $300.0 million to $367.0 million (carrying balance $357.0 million as of September 30, 2026) and expanded undrawn revolver commitments to $183.0 million.
    • Cash and cash equivalents stood at $86.8 million as of September 30, 2026, with nine-month operating cash flow turning positive at $63.9 million compared to negative $24.2 million in the prior-year period.
  • ·State of StreamingFinancials

    Starz Q3 Revenue Up, Loss Narrows as Streaming Offsets Linear

    Starz reported Q3 financial results with revenue of $322.4 million, up 0.5% year-over-year, as streaming revenue grew 1.7% to $226.6 million, offsetting declines in traditional TV distribution. The net loss narrowed to $34.8 million from $52.6 million, beating Wall Street expectations. Streaming gains were partly due to strong performance of Lionsgate's film 'Michael,' the most successful Pay-1 release in Starz history. Additionally, regulatory filings revealed that media mogul Byron Allen sold his entire 10.7% stake in Starz, netting a profit of around $20 million after the company adopted a poison pill defense. CEO Jeffrey Hirsch emphasized a focus on content ownership and distribution partnerships while remaining selective on M&A.

    • Starz Q3 revenue: $322.4M, up 0.5% YoY
    • Net loss narrowed to $34.8M from $52.6M
    • Streaming revenue increased 1.7% to $226.6M
PA

Paramount

Recent Signals

  • ·Cord Cutters NewsCorporate

    Skydance reshuffles leadership after Paramount-Warner Bros. merger

    Following the merger of Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery into Skydance, the company announced a leadership reshuffle in its distribution business. Sarah Bergman (EVP of networks and streaming distribution) and Mickey Carter (EVP of US distribution) will lead the distribution unit. Eight executives are leaving: Rivka Golomb, Kelly Kane, Jeff Cross, Rich Palermo from WBD, and David Comisar, Kurt Davis, Deena Demasi, Ken Kay from Paramount. Seven others take new roles, including Brad Shipley overseeing strategy, partnerships, Pluto TV, and FAST distribution; Patrick Cavanaugh overseeing streaming negotiations; and others in legal, marketing, and affiliate relations. This follows last month's news of buyout offers to employees.

    • Sarah Bergman and Mickey Carter named leaders of Skydance's distribution business.
    • Eight executives are leaving the company, four from Warner Bros. Discovery and four from Paramount.
    • Brad Shipley takes charge of strategy, partnerships, Pluto TV, and FAST distribution.
  • ·Cord Cutters NewsContent Preservation

    AI Fears Threaten Web History: Internet Archive Blocked

    In an essay for The Atlantic, Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle warns that publishers blocking the Wayback Machine over AI-scraping concerns could create gaps in the historical record without stopping AI companies from collecting data. A Pew Research study found that 25% of webpages tracked from 2013-2023 disappeared by October 2023. While the Internet Archive preserves many deleted pages, only 16% of vanished URLs are accessible. Media examples include Paramount removing MTV News content and Warner Bros. Discovery shutting down Cartoon Network's website. Both companies are now under Skydance after Paramount completed its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. Kahle argues blocking the archive won't stop AI scraping but will thin the historical record. Publishers like The New York Times and The Guardian have restricted Internet Archive access. The article highlights the importance of preservation for researchers and ordinary users.

    • Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle warns publishers blocking the Wayback Machine over AI-scraping concerns could leave gaps in the historical record.
    • A Pew Research Center study found that 25% of webpages tracked from 2013 through 2023 were no longer accessible by October 2023.
    • Only 16% of vanished URLs from the Pew study were accessible through the Wayback Machine.
  • ·VideoWeekMedia & Advertising Market Overview

    Week in Charts: TV Ad Market, Netflix Ad Forecast, Agency Stocks

    This week's charts highlight that a combined Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery would lead US TV ad exposure time at 23.9%, surpassing NBCUniversal/Versant. Publicis has regained the top spot in agency market cap, leading Omnicom. New research shows indie agencies see AI as critical for future success, and political content outperforms averages in attention and success rates. In stocks, Omnicom shares rose after strong Q3 results, Netflix dropped after lowering its ad revenue forecast to $2.7 billion, Thomson Reuters rose after selling print majority, Viant continues to climb, and Meta fell after announcing a $95 billion stock offering for AI investments.

    • Combined Paramount/WBD would lead US TV ad exposure time at 23.9% in August.
    • Publicis leads agency holding companies by market cap, ahead of Omnicom.
    • Netflix lowered its full-year ad revenue forecast from $3B to $2.7B.

Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.

Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Lionsgate and Paramount share across the market ecosystem.