B2B SaaS Provider
Linnworks vs SPS Commerce
Structured technology and market comparison · 2026
Direct Feature Comparison
Linnworks · vs · SPS CommerceCommerce operations software for multichannel retailers and warehouse teams.
Retail supply chain software built around EDI and network connectivity.
Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Linnworks and SPS Commerce
Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.
Comparison Analysis
What is the main difference between Linnworks and SPS Commerce?
Linnworks positions itself as a commerce operations platform for multichannel retailers and fulfillment teams, addressing order, inventory and warehouse workflows. SPS Commerce is a network-centric retail supply-chain platform built on EDI and partner connectivity. Both serve retail ecosystems but differ in audience: Linnworks targets merchants and fulfilment operators; SPS targets trading partners and retailers prioritizing standardized EDI connectivity. Core differentiator: operations automation versus networked EDI scale.
How do the features of Linnworks and SPS Commerce compare?
Linnworks delivers multichannel order management, inventory synchronization, fulfillment automation and warehouse integrations—focusing on operational workflows, shipping provider connectors, and implementation services. SPS Commerce provides EDI/document interchange, partner onboarding, compliance, and network analytics—emphasizing standardized trading relationships. Overlap includes order and inventory data exchange; differences: Linnworks offers deeper warehouse/fulfillment automation, while SPS delivers broader EDI network, compliance tooling and large-scale partner connectivity.
What are the top alternatives to Linnworks and SPS Commerce?
When evaluating Linnworks and SPS Commerce, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in AdOps & Tech Implementation and B2B SaaS Provider. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.
How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Linnworks and SPS Commerce compare?
Linnworks is headquartered in United Kingdom (founded in 2005) with 201–500 employees. SPS Commerce is based in United States (founded in 2001) with 1,001–5,000 employees. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.
Market Signals
Recent Market Signals & Activity: Linnworks vs SPS Commerce
Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.
Linnworks
Recent Signals
No recent market signals documented for Linnworks in the current tracking window.
SPS Commerce
Recent Signals
- ·SEC APIfinancials
10-Q Financial Filing Analysis for SPS Commerce (2026-10-29)
SPS Commerce reported solid operational and financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2026, with revenue expanding 4.1% year-over-year to $197.6 million, led by core Fulfillment recurring revenue growth. GAAP net income rose 20.0% to $30.7 million, while Adjusted EBITDA increased 17.2% to $70.9 million, expanding Adjusted EBITDA margin by 400 basis points to 36%. Performance was influenced by the June 30, 2026 divestiture of its 3P revenue recovery business, which reduced recurring customer count by ~8,050 to approximately 46,700 but propelled annualized ARPU up 22% to $16,200 as the company refocused entirely on 1P supplier relationships. Operating cash flow reached $185.7 million for the first nine months, supported by active share repurchases of $149.9 million year-to-date.
- Q3 2026 revenue increased 4.1% year-over-year to $197.65M, with recurring revenue representing 96% ($188.98M) and gross margin improving from 69% to 71%.
- Net income for Q3 2026 reached $30.68M ($0.85 per diluted share), while nine-month operating cash flow totaled $185.66M, up 39.7% year-over-year.
- Following the divestiture of the 3P revenue recovery business, recurring customer count fell 15% to ~46,700, driving annualized ARPU up 22% to $16,200.
- ·https://martech.org/feed/Marketing Automation
Marketo Co-founder Launches AI Marketing Automation Platform Phave
Jon Miller, co-founder of Marketo and Engagio, together with Nick Bonfiglio, formerly head of product and engineering at Marketo, has launched Phave, an AI-powered marketing automation platform for enterprise B2B organizations. After two years in stealth, Phave reached general availability in August 2026 and is now used by 10 companies. Designed to replace legacy MAPs like Marketo, Pardot, Eloqua, and HubSpot, Phave's intelligence engine, Maestro, generates personalized 'Playlists' that dynamically sequence marketing touches based on real-time data, objectives, and governance. The platform treats contacts, accounts, and buying groups as first-class objects, supports natural language configuration, and offers headless access via MCP (exposing 319 tools) and REST API. In an independent evaluation against 481 requirements, Phave scored 2.97, outperforming HubSpot (2.46) and Marketo (2.38). Early enterprise customers include SambaNova, SPS Commerce, mabl, Servion, and Hypha.
- Jon Miller and Nick Bonfiglio founded Phave, an AI-powered B2B marketing automation platform.
- Phave emerged from stealth and reached general availability in August 2026, currently serving 10 companies.
- Phave uses AI reasoning models (via Maestro) and 'Playlists' to personalize and sequence marketing actions.
Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.
Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Linnworks and SPS Commerce share across the market ecosystem.
Unlock full capability matrix, client overlaps & technology stacks