B2B SaaS Provider
Harvey vs Intapp
Structured technology and market comparison · 2026
Direct Feature Comparison
Harvey · vs · IntappEnterprise legal AI platform for law firms and legal departments.
Vertical SaaS for professional and financial services workflows.
Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Harvey and Intapp
Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.
Comparison Analysis
What is the main difference between Harvey and Intapp?
When comparing Harvey and Intapp, both platforms operate within the Conversational AI & Chatbots, B2B SaaS Provider, and Large Language Models (LLM) & AI ecosystem. Harvey is positioned as Enterprise legal AI platform for law firms and legal departments, whereas Intapp focuses on Vertical SaaS for professional and financial services workflows. Decision-makers evaluate both solutions when orchestrating their commercial monetization and technology stack.
What are the top alternatives to Harvey and Intapp?
When evaluating Harvey and Intapp, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Conversational AI & Chatbots, B2B SaaS Provider, and Large Language Models (LLM) & AI. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.
How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Harvey and Intapp compare?
Harvey is headquartered in United States (founded in 2022) with 501–1,000 employees. Intapp is based in United States (founded in 2000) with 1,001–5,000 employees. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.
Market Signals
Recent Market Signals & Activity: Harvey vs Intapp
Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.
Harvey
Recent Signals
- ·Trending Topics (DACH/CEE Innovation & Tech)Legal AI
Legora and Harvey Launch Nearly Identical 'Intake' Products
Two legal AI startups, Legora and Harvey, launched nearly identical products named 'Intake' within a day of each other. Both target in-house corporate legal departments, serving as a central entry point for legal requests. Legora launched first, integrating with Slack, while Harvey launched with design partners Carvana, GE Aerospace, and Dentsu. The coincidence caused commentary and speculation about trademark protection, but 'Intake' is considered a descriptive term. This reveals intense competition to expand beyond law firms into corporate legal teams, a largely untapped market. Harvey claims partnerships with over 1,600 legal departments, and Legora is growing in the UK. Both companies have raised significant funding, with Harvey valued at $15.6 billion and Legora negotiating a valuation over $10 billion. OpenAI and other contract management vendors also compete in this space.
- Legora and Harvey launched nearly identical products named 'Intake' within one day of each other.
- Legora’s 'Intake' is available in Slack; Harvey’s 'Intake' was developed with Carvana, GE Aerospace, and Dentsu.
- Harvey works with over 1,600 legal departments, including five of the ten largest US companies.
- ·Trending Topics (DACH/CEE Innovation & Tech)Legal AI
Legora and Harvey Launch Similar Legal AI Products 'Intake'
In a striking coincidence, legal AI startups Legora and Harvey launched nearly identical products named "Intake" within a day of each other. Both products target in-house legal departments, acting as a central "front door" for legal requests. Legora's Intake, already available in Slack, uses an AI agent to triage requests and draft responses. Harvey's version captures requests from existing tools and integrates with its contract analysis tool, developed with Carvana, GE Aerospace, and Dentsu. The launch sparked commentary and mockery online, though legal disputes over the name are considered unlikely. Behind the timing lies fierce competition to expand into corporate legal teams. Harvey claims over 1,600 in-house legal teams as clients, while Legora's corporate business is growing rapidly. Both companies are engaged in a financial race, having raised significant funding at multi-billion-dollar valuations.
- Legora and Harvey launched nearly identical legal AI products called 'Intake' within one day.
- Harvey developed Intake with in-house legal teams at Carvana, GE Aerospace, and Dentsu.
- Harvey raised $550 million at a valuation of $15.6 billion in September.
- ·Harvey
Run Custom Harvey Agents Directly in Word
Harvey announced the launch of Custom Agents for Word, allowing teams' custom agents built in Agent Builder to run directly in the Harvey for Word Add-in. The agents can perform tasks like NDA review, redlining, summarization, and post-review memos using the user's own standards directly in open Word documents. Users can apply suggestions as tracked changes, and agents stay in sync with web app updates. Availability requires the Harvey for Word Add-in, installable via Microsoft AppSource or through an IT team.
- On September 23, 2026, Harvey launched Custom Agents for Word, integrating custom agents built in Agent Builder into the Harvey for Word Add-in.
- Custom agents can run against open Word documents for tasks such as NDA review, redlining, document summarization, and post-review memos.
- Agent suggestions are inserted as tracked changes, enabling users to apply, apply with comment, or discard each suggestion in Word.
Intapp
Recent Signals
- ·SEC APIfinancials
10-Q Financial Filing Analysis for Intapp (2026-10-27)
Intapp, Inc. reported its financial results for the first fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2026, delivering total revenue of $161.26 million, an increase of 16.0% year-over-year. The expansion was propelled by subscription revenue growth of 28.7% to $125.49 million, reflecting ongoing client migrations to cloud-based solutions and strong adoption of vertical AI workflows across legal, accounting, and private capital markets. Operating loss narrowed significantly from $(14.46) million to $(1.06) million, while net loss improved to $(1.31) million from $(14.35) million in the prior-year period. Operating cash flow expanded to $28.42 million compared to $13.80 million a year earlier. During the quarter, Intapp executed $25.0 million in share repurchases and established a new five-year, $150.0 million revolving credit facility with UBS AG to enhance financial flexibility.
- Total revenue reached $161.26 million for Q1 FY2027, driven by 28.7% YoY growth in subscription revenue to $125.49 million, while ARR climbed 20% YoY to $607.1 million.
- GAAP operating loss contracted sharply to $(1.06) million from $(14.46) million, while operating cash flow more than doubled to $28.42 million.
- Intapp secured a new 5-year $150 million revolving credit facility led by UBS AG and repurchased 0.61 million shares for $25.0 million, leaving $50.0 million under the authorized repurchase program.
- ·SEC APIfinancials
10-K Financial Filing Analysis for Intapp (2026-08-14)
Intapp, Inc. reported its financial results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, delivering total revenue of $577.8 million with a strong gross margin of 76% and operating cash flow of $146.8 million. Total Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) grew 22% year-over-year to $590.5 million, propelled by a 29% expansion in Cloud ARR to $495.7 million, which now comprises 84% of total ARR. The company maintained strong net retention, demonstrating a trailing twelve months Cloud Net Revenue Retention (NRR) rate of 123%. Operational expansion was supported by the roll-out of Intapp Celeste, its agentic AI coworker designed for vertical workflows across legal, accounting, and private capital firms. Remaining performance obligations reached $833.0 million, and enterprise clients generating over $50,000 ARR rose 10% to more than 1,400. During the fiscal year, Intapp returned capital to shareholders via $275.2 million in common share repurchases, maintaining $162.8 million in cash and cash equivalents.
- Total revenue reached $577.8 million for FY2026 with a gross margin of 76% and operating cash flow of $146.8 million.
- Cloud ARR grew 29% YoY to $495.7 million, representing 84% of total ARR ($590.5 million), with a Cloud NRR of 123%.
- Enterprise clients with >$50k ARR increased 10% to over 1,400, while RPO expanded to $833.0 million.
- ·Intapp
Intapp News Room: New Blog Posts on AI Governance, Firm AI, and Compliance
Intapp published a blog post discussing gaps in on-premises information barrier solutions created before the advent of artificial intelligence. The article references Intapp's product suite across compliance, growth, profitability, and collaboration solutions including Intapp Walls. The content addresses architectural considerations for firms managing compliance and AI governance.
- Intapp published an article analyzing limitations of on-premises Walls software predating modern AI.
- The publication highlights products across compliance, such as Intapp Conflicts, Intake, Terms, Walls, and Employee Compliance.
- Intapp's broader solutions portfolio spans industries including consulting, corporate, investment banking and advisory, and legal sectors.
Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.
Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Harvey and Intapp share across the market ecosystem.
Unlock full capability matrix, client overlaps & technology stacks