Publisher & Media Owner · Data Provider / Broker · vs · Publisher & Media Owner · Agency & Consultancy
Gambling.com Group vs Red Ventures
Structured technology and market comparison · 2026
Direct Feature Comparison
Gambling.com Group · vs · Red VenturesAffiliate publisher driving gambling customer acquisition through SEO content.
Digital publisher and performance marketing portfolio for high-intent audiences.
Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Gambling.com Group and Red Ventures
Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.
Comparison Analysis
What is the main difference between Gambling.com Group and Red Ventures?
When comparing Gambling.com Group and Red Ventures, both platforms operate within the Publisher Platform, Display, Web & Mobile, and Publisher & Media Owner ecosystem. Gambling.com Group is positioned as Affiliate publisher driving gambling customer acquisition through SEO content, whereas Red Ventures focuses on Digital publisher and performance marketing portfolio for high-intent audiences. Decision-makers evaluate both solutions when orchestrating their commercial monetization and technology stack.
What are the top alternatives to Gambling.com Group and Red Ventures?
When evaluating Gambling.com Group and Red Ventures, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Publisher Platform, Display, Web & Mobile, and Publisher & Media Owner. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.
How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Gambling.com Group and Red Ventures compare?
Gambling.com Group is headquartered in JE (founded in 2006) with 501–1,000 employees. Red Ventures is based in US (founding year unrecorded) with 1,001–5,000 employees. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.
Market Signals
Recent Market Signals & Activity: Gambling.com Group vs Red Ventures
Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.
Gambling.com Group
Recent Signals
- ·SEC APIfinancials
6-K Financial Filing Analysis for Gambling.com Group (2026-08-13)
Grandstand Limited (formerly Gambling.com Group Limited) filed its interim report for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026. For H1 2026, the company reported total revenue of $78.20 million, a 3% decline year-over-year (9% on a constant currency basis), driven by SEO and Google algorithmic headwinds affecting its marketing segment, partially offset by a 13% expansion in its data subscription business. Operating profit reached $2.10 million compared to an operating loss of $4.81 million in H1 2025, which had been burdened by a $21.63 million contingent consideration fair value charge. Net loss for the six-month period was $5.80 million, primarily due to higher net finance expenses ($6.33 million) and $3.30 million in restructuring charges from a workforce reduction of approximately 25%. On July 16, 2026, the corporate name was officially changed to Grandstand Limited, and the company subsequently launched Rollcard, a specialized Visa debit card targeting high-volume gaming and trading participants.
- Revenue for H1 2026 totaled $78.20 million (down 3% YoY), while Q2 2026 revenue was $37.76 million (down 5% YoY).
- Implemented a major restructuring in May 2026 reducing approximately 25% of the workforce, incurring $3.30 million in restructuring expenses in H1 2026.
- Formally changed the corporate name to Grandstand Limited on July 16, 2026, and rolled out Rollcard, a Visa debit card for bettors and traders, in August 2026.
Red Ventures
Recent Signals
- ·a16zAI Agents
Long-Running Agents Win High-Value Customer Journeys
This analysis from a16z explores how long-running AI agents can transform high-value customer journeys that span weeks or months, such as insurance claims, mortgage origination, plaintiff law case preparation, and enterprise sales. These agents, unlike bounded task-oriented bots, can manage dozens of steps across multiple modalities and time horizons, addressing value leaks like slow response times, limited evidence review, and information loss. The article highlights Red Ventures as a historical example of owning end-to-end customer journeys, generating ~$370M EBITDA on ~$1.4B sales in 2022, but now facing structural threats from AI-native agents. It proposes three go-to-market motions: selling the platform, selling the service, or going full-stack, and emphasizes outcome-based pricing as a key opportunity.
- Long-running AI agents can manage customer journeys spanning weeks or months across multiple steps and modalities.
- Red Ventures generated ~$370M EBITDA on ~$1.4B sales in 2022.
- Red Ventures' EBITDA declined to an estimated ~$160M in 2025.
Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.
Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Gambling.com Group and Red Ventures share across the market ecosystem.
Unlock full capability matrix, client overlaps & technology stacks