Publisher & Media Owner · Data Provider / Broker · vs · B2C Consumer App / Platform
Gambling.com Group vs NEO.bet
Structured technology and market comparison · 2026
Direct Feature Comparison
Gambling.com Group · vs · NEO.betAffiliate publisher driving gambling customer acquisition through SEO content.
Consumer sportsbook and betting platform for regulated markets.
Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Gambling.com Group and NEO.bet
Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.
Comparison Analysis
What is the main difference between Gambling.com Group and NEO.bet?
When comparing Gambling.com Group and NEO.bet, both platforms operate within the Display, Web & Mobile ecosystem. Gambling.com Group is positioned as Affiliate publisher driving gambling customer acquisition through SEO content, whereas NEO.bet focuses on Consumer sportsbook and betting platform for regulated markets. Decision-makers evaluate both solutions when orchestrating their commercial monetization and technology stack.
What are the top alternatives to Gambling.com Group and NEO.bet?
When evaluating Gambling.com Group and NEO.bet, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Display, Web & Mobile. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.
How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Gambling.com Group and NEO.bet compare?
Gambling.com Group is headquartered in JE (founded in 2006) with 501–1,000 employees. NEO.bet is based in MT (founded in 2017) with 10–49 employees. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.
Market Signals
Recent Market Signals & Activity: Gambling.com Group vs NEO.bet
Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.
Gambling.com Group
Recent Signals
- ·SEC APIfinancials
6-K Financial Filing Analysis for Gambling.com Group (2026-08-13)
Grandstand Limited (formerly Gambling.com Group Limited) filed its interim report for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026. For H1 2026, the company reported total revenue of $78.20 million, a 3% decline year-over-year (9% on a constant currency basis), driven by SEO and Google algorithmic headwinds affecting its marketing segment, partially offset by a 13% expansion in its data subscription business. Operating profit reached $2.10 million compared to an operating loss of $4.81 million in H1 2025, which had been burdened by a $21.63 million contingent consideration fair value charge. Net loss for the six-month period was $5.80 million, primarily due to higher net finance expenses ($6.33 million) and $3.30 million in restructuring charges from a workforce reduction of approximately 25%. On July 16, 2026, the corporate name was officially changed to Grandstand Limited, and the company subsequently launched Rollcard, a specialized Visa debit card targeting high-volume gaming and trading participants.
- Revenue for H1 2026 totaled $78.20 million (down 3% YoY), while Q2 2026 revenue was $37.76 million (down 5% YoY).
- Implemented a major restructuring in May 2026 reducing approximately 25% of the workforce, incurring $3.30 million in restructuring expenses in H1 2026.
- Formally changed the corporate name to Grandstand Limited on July 16, 2026, and rolled out Rollcard, a Visa debit card for bettors and traders, in August 2026.
NEO.bet
Recent Signals
No recent market signals documented for NEO.bet in the current tracking window.
Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.
Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Gambling.com Group and NEO.bet share across the market ecosystem.
Unlock full capability matrix, client overlaps & technology stacks
