Domo vs PostHog

10-Q Financial Filing Analysis for Domo (2026-09-03)

For the second quarter ended July 31, 2026, Domo reported total revenue of $76.8 million, down 4% year-over-year, and a GAAP net loss of $9.6 million compared to a net loss of $22.9 million in the prior-year period. Subscription revenue represented 92% of total revenue at $70.4 million. The company faced severe liquidity and covenant compliance issues, remaining in breach of its credit facility's minimum annualized recurring revenue covenant as of April 30, 2026, and July 31, 2026, resulting in substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. To resolve its debt default and secure liquidity, Domo entered into a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement on July 22, 2026, with Progress Software Corporation. Progress will acquire substantially all operating assets, the platform, customer contracts, and subsidiaries for $400 million in cash. Domo will use the proceeds to repay its $137.2 million debt obligations in full, retain its net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, and transition into a debt-free holding company trading under a new ticker symbol.

• Domo signed a definitive agreement on July 22, 2026, to sell substantially all operating assets and business to Progress Software for $400 million in cash.
• The company remained out of compliance with its debt covenants as of July 31, 2026, operating under a forbearance agreement requiring sale completion by November 30, 2026, to pay off $137.24 million in debt.
• Q2 revenue reached $76.78 million (down 4% YoY) with a net loss of $9.62 million and cash/cash equivalents of $25.07 million.

8-K Financial Filing Analysis for Domo (2026-09-22)

On September 22, 2026, Domo, Inc. completed the sale of substantially all of its business assets and transferred its operational employees to Progress Software Corporation pursuant to the July 22, 2026 Asset Purchase Agreement. Domo received approximately $221.0 million in net cash proceeds upon closing, retaining its net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. Concurrently, the company terminated and fully repaid its Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement with Obsidian Agency Services and Wilmington Trust, while also repurchasing outstanding warrants for approximately $10.0 million. Following the divestiture, the corporate entity was rebranded as Huckleberry.ai, Inc. via a short-form subsidiary merger, and its Class B Common Stock ticker on the Nasdaq Global Market will change from 'DOMO' to 'HUCK' effective September 24, 2026.

• Completed the asset sale of Domo's core BI and analytics software business to Progress Software Corporation for approximately $221.0 million in net cash proceeds, retaining tax NOL carryforwards.
• Repaid in full and terminated the August 2023 Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, releasing all associated liens and discharging outstanding debt obligations.
• Rebranded the corporate entity to Huckleberry.ai, Inc., repurchased outstanding warrants for $10.0 million, and announced a Nasdaq ticker change from 'DOMO' to 'HUCK' effective September 24, 2026.

New Product Features and AI Announcements Shared at Domo Connections 2026

Domo announced new product features and AI capabilities at its Domo Connections 2026 event, as highlighted in a blog post dated September 18, 2026.

AI Native Startups Boost PR Output Tenfold

In a detailed essay, software engineer Neil Kakkar compares his productivity across three companies: Bloomberg, PostHog, and Tano. At Bloomberg and PostHog, he shipped 8-20 pull requests per month, while at Tano, an AI-native startup, he now ships over 200 PRs monthly, an 11x increase. This surge is attributed to AI coding agents like Claude Code, which handle end-to-end feature development, automated code reviews, and continuous integration. Key trade-offs include loss of human code reviews, increased context switching, and 'thrashing' from multitasking. Tano operates without human PR reviews, relying instead on an automated reviewer agent. The author notes that AI is a speed multiplier, but requires culture shifts and guardrails to prevent burnout. The essay highlights that AI-native startups can iterate much faster, but pre-AI companies can catch up by adopting similar practices.

• Neil Kakkar's PR output increased 11x at AI-native startup Tano compared to PostHog.
• Tano uses Claude Code agents to build features end-to-end and an automated code review agent.
• At Tano, PR merge time is less than one hour, and the revert rate is 6x lower than at PostHog.

Build vs Buy: Cookie Banner for React/Next.js

This technical guide compares building a custom cookie banner versus using a consent management platform (CMP) for React and Next.js applications. It argues teams should build their own banner only when requirements are narrow and the engineering team is prepared to maintain consent infrastructure over time. The article highlights key responsibilities of production consent systems — script gating, preference storage, withdrawal support, regional behaviour, and durable records — and presents c15t as a developer-first CMP that supports hosted, self-hosted, and browser-only deployments. Inth is named as a managed hosting provider for c15t. The guide stresses that script gating and backend persistence are critical when auditability and regulatory accountability (e.g., GDPR/UK rules) matter.

• The article recommends building a custom cookie banner only if requirements are narrow and the team is prepared to maintain the logic over time.
• c15t is described as a developer-first consent management platform that supports hosted, self-hosted, and browser-only deployments.
• Inth provides a managed hosted deployment option for c15t teams that do not want to operate the backend themselves.