BOMA

B2B SaaS Provider

Boomi vs Make

Structured technology and market comparison · 2026

Direct Feature Comparison

Boomi · vs · Make
Market Cluster / Sector
BoomiB2B SaaS Provider
MakeB2B SaaS Provider
Platform Focus
Boomi

Enterprise integration, API management and data automation SaaS platform.

Make

Visual no-code workflow automation platform for business teams.

Company Size
Boomi1,001–5,000 employees
Make50–200 employees
Headquarters
BoomiUS
MakeCZ
Year Founded
Boomi2000
MakeUnknown

Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Boomi and Make

Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.

Compare free in ExplorerFree · No credit card · 1-click via Google/LinkedIn

Comparison Analysis

What is the main difference between Boomi and Make?

Boomi targets Fortune 500 enterprises requiring robust, high-governance integration across complex legacy and cloud ecosystems via unified architectures. Conversely, Make addresses business teams and digital agencies through visual, no-code workflow automation. While Boomi focuses on centralized IT control, multi-tenant scalability, and enterprise compliance, Make emphasizes operational agility, rapid prototyping, and democratized integration design for cross-functional business units.

How do the features of Boomi and Make compare?

Boomi offers enterprise-grade capabilities including full lifecycle API management, master data hubs, B2B/EDI, and hybrid execution runtimes designed for massive enterprise throughput. Make delivers intuitive visual scenario builders, complex data manipulation functions, and extensive SaaS connectors tailored for agile automation. Technical overlap exists in API orchestration, yet Boomi serves core enterprise IT architects, whereas Make empowers operational business technologists.

What are the top alternatives to Boomi and Make?

When evaluating Boomi and Make, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Marketing Automation Platform, B2B SaaS Provider, and Cloud Data Warehouse / Data Lake. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.

How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Boomi and Make compare?

Boomi is headquartered in US (founded in 2000) with 1,001–5,000 employees. Make is based in CZ (founding year unrecorded) with 50–200 employees. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.

Market Signals

Recent Market Signals & Activity: Boomi vs Make

Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.

BO

Boomi

Recent Signals

  • ·https://martechseries.com/feed/Hiring

    Boomi Appoints Mike Hickman as Chief Financial Officer

    Boomi, the data activation company for AI, announced the appointment of Mike Hickman as Chief Financial Officer. Hickman will lead Boomi's global finance organization, including financial planning, accounting, treasury, tax, and reporting. He brings three decades of senior finance leadership, with experience at Proofpoint, Adobe, Marin Software, eBay, and Vitria Technology. At Proofpoint, he helped navigate a $12.3 billion take-private and a $1.8 billion acquisition. Boomi's CEO Steve Lucas highlighted Hickman's experience across IPO, take-private, and acquisitions. The appointment supports Boomi's scaling efforts with over 30,000 customers and 2,200 employees.

    • Boomi appointed Mike Hickman as CFO.
    • Hickman previously served as SVP of Finance at Proofpoint for 7.5 years.
    • He has experience with IPO, take-private, and large acquisitions.
  • ·https://martechseries.com/feed/Application Integration / Platform Leadership

    Boomi Ranked No.1 in ISG 2026 Integration Guide

    Boomi was ranked the #1 overall software provider in ISG Buyers Guide™ for Application Integration 2026, placing in ISG’s highest quadrant classification, Exemplary. ISG Software Research evaluated 24 providers and designated Boomi a Leader overall and in every category, including #1 rankings for Capability and Product Experience and top scores in Customer Experience. ISG cited Boomi’s breadth of integration, API management and AI capabilities and highlighted the company’s expansion into agentic integration development, agent management and governance. Quotes from Boomi and ISG research leadership emphasize the company’s investments in integration, automation and agent governance to support operationalizing agentic AI.

    • Boomi was ranked #1 overall software provider in the 2026 ISG Buyers Guide for Application Integration.
    • ISG placed Boomi in its highest quadrant classification, Exemplary, and named it a Leader in every category evaluated.
    • The report evaluated 24 providers; Boomi received #1 rankings for Capability and Product Experience and the highest score in Customer Experience.
MA

Make

Recent Signals

  • ·DEV CommunityInfrastructure

    Laravel Queue Stopped — Root Cause Was PHP-FPM

    A developer debugging a Laravel application on a cPanel server discovered that recurring queue stoppages and Make.com request timeouts were caused by infrastructure issues rather than the queue itself. The queue worker had been started with nohup and disappeared after server restarts; moving execution to a cPanel Cron job with /bin/flock and --stop-when-empty made the worker lifecycle more resilient. Separately, slow or queued HTTP requests were traced to an overly conservative PHP-FPM configuration (pm.max_children = 5, pm.max_requests = 20, pm.process_idle_timeout = 10) on a 65 GB / 20-core server. The author recommends tuning PHP-FPM to match server capacity and diagnosing each layer independently.

    • Laravel application ran on a cPanel server and used Redis for queueing.
    • Initial queue worker was started with nohup and was killed by server restarts, requiring manual restarts.
    • Queue execution was moved to cPanel Cron using /bin/flock and php artisan queue:work with --stop-when-empty.
  • ·DEV CommunityMeasurement & Analytics Platform

    Twilio to remove conference_participant on Aug 1, 2026

    Twilio will remove the conference_participant field from Voice Insights Call Summary on August 1, 2026. The field will remain in responses but its attributes will uniformly return null (HTTP 200 unchanged) across both the REST API and Event Streams. Twilio points customers to the separate Conference Insights APIs (conference- and participant-keyed resources) as the replacement, meaning migrations require capturing or mapping ConferenceSid/ParticipantSid and reshaping call-centric storage to conference-centric storage. Because the change preserves response shape and status codes, analytics and pipeline consumers that relied on conference_participant may silently see conference metrics decay to zero rather than generate errors.

    • Twilio will remove the conference_participant field from Voice Insights Call Summary on August 1, 2026, affecting both the REST API and Event Streams.
    • After removal the field remains present in responses but conference_participant.attributes will return null for all calls while responses continue to be HTTP 200.
    • Twilio's recommended replacement is the separate Conference Insights APIs, which are keyed by ConferenceSid and ParticipantSid (conference-centric addressing).
  • ·DEV CommunityMarketing Automation Platform

    n8n Guide: Self-Hosted Workflow Automation with AI

    This technical guide explains how to use n8n, a fair-code, developer-first workflow orchestration tool, to automate business processes from simple webhooks to multi-agent AI enrichment. It covers core advantages (self-hosting for data sovereignty, native JavaScript/Python nodes, complex data handling), a Docker Compose example for quick self-hosted deployment, a real-world lead-processing architecture with AI enrichment and CRM routing, and production best practices (idempotency, error triggers, queueing, secure credentials). The article emphasizes native AI orchestration via integrations with LangChain, OpenAI, Claude, and local vector databases and offers operational patterns for scaling high-throughput workflows.

    • n8n is described as a fair-code, developer-first workflow orchestration tool that treats workflows as structured code pipelines.
    • n8n supports self-hosting in Docker containers, AWS VPCs, or Kubernetes clusters to meet GDPR, SOC2, or HIPAA compliance requirements.
    • The guide provides a Docker Compose example using a Postgres service and an n8n container exposing port 5678 for local deployment.

Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.

Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Boomi and Make share across the market ecosystem.