ARTH

B2B SaaS Provider · Data Provider / Broker · vs · Agency & Consultancy · B2B SaaS Provider

Artificial Analysis vs The Hackett Group

Structured technology and market comparison · 2026

Direct Feature Comparison

Artificial Analysis · vs · The Hackett Group
Market Cluster / Sector
Artificial AnalysisB2B SaaS Provider · Data Provider / Broker
The Hackett GroupAgency & Consultancy · B2B SaaS Provider
Platform Focus
Artificial Analysis

Independent AI model benchmarking and selection platform.

The Hackett Group

Enterprise benchmarking, advisory and AI transformation consultancy.

Company Size
Artificial Analysis10–49 employees
The Hackett Group1,001–5,000 employees
Headquarters
Artificial AnalysisUS
The Hackett GroupUS
Year Founded
Artificial AnalysisUnknown
The Hackett Group1991

Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Artificial Analysis and The Hackett Group

Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.

Compare free in ExplorerFree · No credit card · 1-click via Google/LinkedIn

Comparison Analysis

What is the main difference between Artificial Analysis and The Hackett Group?

When comparing Artificial Analysis and The Hackett Group, both platforms operate within the Measurement & Analytics Platform and B2B SaaS Provider ecosystem. Artificial Analysis is positioned as Independent AI model benchmarking and selection platform, whereas The Hackett Group focuses on Enterprise benchmarking, advisory and AI transformation consultancy. Decision-makers evaluate both solutions when orchestrating their commercial monetization and technology stack.

What are the top alternatives to Artificial Analysis and The Hackett Group?

When evaluating Artificial Analysis and The Hackett Group, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Measurement & Analytics Platform and B2B SaaS Provider. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.

How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Artificial Analysis and The Hackett Group compare?

Artificial Analysis is headquartered in US (founding year unrecorded) with 10–49 employees. The Hackett Group is based in US (founded in 1991) with 1,001–5,000 employees. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.

Market Signals

Recent Market Signals & Activity: Artificial Analysis vs The Hackett Group

Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.

AR

Artificial Analysis

Recent Signals

  • ·Artificial Analysis

    Korean AI Lab Upstage releases Solar Mini 4

    New articles added: Korean AI Lab Upstage releases Solar Mini 4, Gemini 4 Argon: Google is back as one of the top three labs in intelligence achieved, AA-AgentPerf-Local: Benchmarking local AI agents on laptops and workstations, GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence, Announcing the Artificial Analysis Cyber Index Alliance, Claude Sonnet 5.5 reaches #2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

  • ·Trending Topics (DACH/CEE Innovation & Tech)AI Models

    Gemini 4 Matches GPT-6 Astra, Trails Opus 5.5

    Independent benchmark provider Artificial Analysis shows Google's Gemini 4 Argon scores 52.6-53 on its Intelligence Index, tying with OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra (52.7) but trailing Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 (57.6). Argon excels in agentic tasks and hallucination reduction (15% rate, lowest among top models) but lags in terminal coding and knowledge work. Google offers a 50% introductory discount for at least a month, pricing Argon at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens—half the price of Opus 5.5 and a fifth of GPT-6 Astra. Per typical task, Argon costs $1.99, compared to $3.26 for GPT-6 Astra and $5.98 for Opus 5.5, though it is token-hungry. Initially, Argon is available only to select cybersecurity teams, with broader API access planned later.

    • Gemini 4 Argon scores approximately 52.6-53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, tying with GPT-6 Astra (52.7) but trailing Claude Opus 5.5 (57.6).
    • Argon leads on AutomationBench (78%) and has a hallucination rate of 15%, the lowest among top models.
    • At a 50% launch discount (for at least a month), Argon costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens—half the price of Opus 5.5 and a fifth of GPT-6 Astra.
  • ·OpenAI BlogAI Models

    OpenAI introduces GPT-6.1 Sol, cheaper near-Astra model

    This week's AI/ML news highlights significant model releases and a trend toward specialized, cost-efficient AI. OpenAI introduced GPT-6.1 Sol, a cost-efficient model for complex coding tasks, scoring 52 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index—one point below GPT-6 Astra—with a 1.05M-token context window and API pricing at $2/M input and $10/M output tokens. Sol excels in agentic coding and computer use, outperforming GPT-6 Sol on benchmarks, and is available in ChatGPT Work and Codex. Notably, OpenAI cancelled GPT-6.1 Astra due to safety concerns. Emerson also launched Claude Sonnet 5.5, claiming faster output and lower costs, while Cloudflare released Clef decision models, NVIDIA unveiled Kumo Tabular, and Google announced Gemini 4 Argon. The overarching theme is the shift toward heterogeneous AI architectures.

    • OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Sol on September 29, 2026, with a 1.05M-token context window, $2/M input and $10/M output tokens, and a score of 52 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
    • GPT-6.1 Sol costs $0.72 per task, about a quarter of GPT-6 Astra's $3.26, and outperforms GPT-6 Sol on DeepSWE 1.1 and AutomationBench, while OpenAI cancelled GPT-6.1 Astra due to safety concerns.
    • Anthropic launched Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, 2026, claiming 30% faster output and up to 30% lower cost per task.
TH

The Hackett Group

Recent Signals

  • ·SEC APIfinancials

    8-K Financial Filing Analysis for The Hackett Group (2026-08-04)

    On August 3, 2026, The Hackett Group, Inc. entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and participating lenders. The agreement extends the maturity date of the company's revolving credit facility to August 3, 2031, and expands total borrowing capacity by $25 million to an aggregate of $125 million. As of August 3, 2026, borrowings outstanding under the facility totaled $81.0 million. The amended facility carries pricing based on consolidated leverage, with an initial applicable margin of 1.625% per annum for Term SOFR advances and 0.625% for base rate advances, alongside an initial commitment fee of 0.225% on unused commitments. Covenants require maintaining a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.50:1.00 and a leverage ratio of not more than 3.50:1.00. The refinancing bolsters liquidity and extends Hackett's debt maturity profile to support ongoing operations and strategic transformation initiatives.

    • Expanded revolving credit capacity from $100 million to $125 million, with $81.0 million outstanding as of August 3, 2026.
    • Extended facility maturity by five years to August 3, 2031, under an amended agreement with Bank of America, N.A.
    • Initial interest margin set at Term SOFR + 1.625% (or base rate + 0.625%) subject to financial covenants requiring a maximum leverage ratio of 3.50:1.00 and minimum fixed charge coverage of 1.50:1.00.
  • ·SEC APIfinancials

    10-Q Financial Filing Analysis for The Hackett Group (2026-08-05)

    The Hackett Group, Inc. reported its Q2 2026 financial results, with total revenue declining 12.2% year-over-year to $69.3 million compared to $78.9 million in Q2 2025. The contraction was primarily driven by elongated client decision-making cycles as enterprise customers assess the ROI of Gen AI-first adoption strategies. To adapt, the company incurred $0.5 million in restructuring charges during the quarter ($2.4 million year-to-date) related to workforce reductions aimed at realigning headcount with market demand and shifting delivery toward proprietary Gen AI platforms. Subsequent to the quarter on August 3, 2026, the company expanded its financial flexibility by amending its credit facility with Bank of America, extending its maturity and increasing borrowing capacity by $25 million to $125 million.

    • Q2 2026 total revenue decreased to $69.3 million, down from $78.9 million in Q2 2025, due to elongated enterprise decision-making cycles around Gen AI.
    • Restructuring expenses related to workforce reductions and the Gen AI strategic pivot totaled $0.5 million for Q2 and $2.4 million for the six-month period ended June 26, 2026.
    • On August 3, 2026, the company amended its credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., increasing total borrowing capacity by $25 million to $125 million and extending the maturity date.

Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.

Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Artificial Analysis and The Hackett Group share across the market ecosystem.