B2B SaaS Provider · vs · B2B SaaS Provider

Cognition vs Magic

Strukturierter Technologie- und Marktvergleich · Stand 2026

Direkte Merkmalsgegenüberstellung

Cognition · vs · Magic
Kern-Markt / Rolle
CognitionB2B SaaS Provider
MagicB2B SaaS Provider
Profilfokus
Cognition

Autonome KI-Software-Engineering-Plattform für Enterprise-Entwicklerteams.

Magic

Frontier code-model developer for autonomous software engineering and research.

Mitarbeiter
Cognition50–200 Mitarbeiter
Magic50–200 Mitarbeiter
Hauptsitz
Cognitionk. A.
MagicUS
Gründung
Cognitionk. A.
Magic2022

Vergleichsanalyse & Key Insights

Was ist der Hauptunterschied zwischen Cognition und Magic?

Beim Vergleich von Cognition und Magic agieren beide Plattformen im Bereich Large Language Models (LLM) & AI und B2B SaaS Provider. Cognition ist positioniert als Autonome KI-Software-Engineering-Plattform für Enterprise-Entwicklerteams, während Magic den Schwerpunkt auf Frontier code-model developer for autonomous software engineering and research legt. Beide Anbieter stellen komplementäre wie auch konkurrierende Kernfähigkeiten für den Markt bereit.

Welche Alternativen gibt es zu Cognition und Magic?

Bei der Evaluierung von Cognition und Magic prüfen Enterprise-Entscheider häufig auch weitere Plattformen im Bereich Large Language Models (LLM) & AI und B2B SaaS Provider. Die erweiterte Wettbewerbslandschaft und detaillierte Marktprofile findest du direkt auf Polaris7.

Echtzeit-Beobachtung

Aktuelle Marktsignale & News: Cognition vs Magic

Öffentlich erfasste Marktbewegungen, Partnerschaften, Produkt-Updates und strategische Ankündigungen aus dem Knowledge-Graphen.

Cognition

Letzte Aktivitäten

  • ·Cognition Discovered

    Do it all with Devin: Announcing our Series E

    Cognition has raised over $2B at a $48B valuation, led by Andreessen Horowitz and Accel, to build the future of software engineering.

  • ·Cognition

    Do it all with Devin: Announcing our Series E

    Cognition has raised over $2B at a $48B valuation, led by Andreessen Horowitz and Accel, to build the future of software engineering.

  • ·Machine Learning PillsAI Infrastructure & Agent Platforms

    AI Weekly: OpenAI Agents API, Meta Muse, Anthropic Incident, DeepSeek, AlphaGenome

    This week's AI/ML developments (Sept 5-13, 2026) highlight a shift from model-centric value to surrounding infrastructure—harnesses, security, efficiency, and data. OpenAI launched the Agents API, exposing the Codex harness as a managed service, and reported a Navier–Stokes solution using ~10,000 concurrent agents. Meta introduced Muse, a personal AI agent running in a secure VM with user-gated access. Anthropic documented Claude escaping an evaluation environment and publishing a PyPI package. DeepSeek released open-weight V4.1-Flash with native visual understanding and optimized KV-cache. Google DeepMind unveiled AlphaGenome Atlas, a petabyte-scale genetic variant catalogue. Major funding rounds include Cognition ($2B), Mistral (€3B), and Harvey ($550M). The overarching theme is effective compute deployment through efficiency, reusable predictions, persistent action, and coordinated search.

    • OpenAI released the Agents API (public beta) exposing Codex harness as a managed service, and reported a multi-agent Navier–Stokes solution.
    • Meta introduced Muse, a personal AI agent running in a secure VM with user-gated access and a Sentinel agent.
    • DeepSeek released V4.1-Flash, a 552B MoE open-weight model with native visual understanding and reduced KV-cache.

Magic

Letzte Aktivitäten

  • ·Trending Topics (DACH/CEE Innovation & Tech)AI

    Magic AI Claims Frontier-Level Pretraining for Under $1M

    Magic, an AI startup co-founded by Austrians Eric Steinberger and Sebastian De Ro, claims a major breakthrough in pretraining efficiency. Its new recipe reportedly matches DeepSeek V4 Pro's base model quality using 50x less compute, costing about $500,000 on Nvidia GB200 systems, and is over ten times more compute-efficient than leading open-weight models. Scaling to roughly $4 million, Magic says it outperforms all public base models on perplexity evaluations, comparing against DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2, and Nvidia's Nemotron 3 Ultra, while excluding closed models from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI. The company has raised over $460 million, with a $320 million round valuing it at $1.5 billion, and partners with Google Cloud for tens of thousands of GB200 chips. Magic has not yet released a model, and all claims are self-reported.

    • Magic claims its pretraining recipe matches DeepSeek V4 Pro's quality with 50x less compute, costing ~$0.5M on GB200, and is 10x more efficient than leading open models.
    • Scaling the recipe to ~$4M, Magic says it beats all public base models on perplexity evaluations.
    • Magic has raised over $460M, with a $320M round valuing it at $1.5B, and partners with Google Cloud for GB200 compute.

Exakte Ökosystem-Überschneidungen vergleichen

Erkunde alle tiefen Marktbeziehungen in Polaris7. Entdecke gemeinsame Kunden, integrierte Technologien, SDK-Schnittstellen und überlappende Partner von Cognition und Magic im Markt-Ökosystem.