App Logo
DEEN
Get Started
BRPU

Advertiser / Brand · Retailer & Marketplace · vs · Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) Brand · Advertiser / Brand

Brooks Running vs PUMA

Structured technology and market comparison · 2026

Direct Feature Comparison

Brooks Running · vs · PUMA
Market Cluster / Sector
Brooks RunningAdvertiser / Brand · Retailer & Marketplace
PUMADirect-to-Consumer (D2C) Brand · Advertiser / Brand
Platform Focus
Brooks Running

Performance running brand selling footwear and apparel through owned commerce.

PUMA

Global sportswear brand selling footwear, apparel and accessories direct.

Company Size
Brooks Running1,001–5,000 employees
PUMA>5,000 employees
Headquarters
Brooks RunningUnited States
PUMAGermany
Year Founded
Brooks Running1914
PUMA1948
Dossier & Alternatives

Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Brooks Running and PUMA

Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.

Compare in PlatformInstant access · 1-click via Google/LinkedIn

Comparison Analysis

What is the main difference between Brooks Running and PUMA?

When comparing Brooks Running and PUMA, both platforms operate within the Publisher Platform, Display, Web & Mobile, and Advertiser / Brand ecosystem. Brooks Running is positioned as Performance running brand selling footwear and apparel through owned commerce, whereas PUMA focuses on Global sportswear brand selling footwear, apparel and accessories direct. Decision-makers evaluate both solutions when orchestrating their commercial monetization and technology stack.

What are the top alternatives to Brooks Running and PUMA?

When evaluating Brooks Running and PUMA, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Publisher Platform, Display, Web & Mobile, and Advertiser / Brand. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.

How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Brooks Running and PUMA compare?

Brooks Running is headquartered in United States (founded in 1914) with 1,001–5,000 employees. PUMA is based in Germany (founded in 1948) with >5,000 employees. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.

Market Signals

Recent Market Signals & Activity: Brooks Running vs PUMA

Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.

BR

Brooks Running

Recent Signals

View all signals for Brooks Running →
PU

PUMA

Recent Signals

  • ·PUMA

    What Motivates Mondo to Keep Raising the Bar

    New article added to PUMA's Catch Up magazine featuring an interview with Mondo Duplantis on what motivates him to keep raising the bar.

  • ·PUMA

    PUMA Q3 2026 sales performance improves sequentially – FY 2026 outlook updated

    PUMA released its Q3 2026 results, reporting sequential sales improvement and updating its full-year 2026 outlook.

  • ·Retail-NewsFinancials

    PUMA Q3 Revenue Falls, Operating Loss Reported

    PUMA reported third-quarter 2026 revenue of €1.78 billion, a currency-adjusted decline of 6.3% year-over-year. The company posted an operating loss of €11.4 million, compared to a profit of €16.2 million in the prior year, due to ongoing restructuring, higher costs, and weak demand in Europe and North America. EMEA sales fell 11.5% and North America dropped 17.2%, while Asia-Pacific grew 10% boosted by Speedcat sneakers. The gross margin improved to 49.5% thanks to lower input costs and tariff refunds. Direct-to-consumer sales, including e-commerce up 7.8%, gained share. Free cash flow turned positive at €92 million, and inventory fell 24.3%. The company narrowed its full-year EBIT guidance to a loss of €80-130 million, and ANTA Sports became its largest shareholder in October.

    • PUMA reported Q3 2026 revenue of €1.78 billion, a currency-adjusted decline of 6.3%.
    • Operating loss of €11.4 million, compared to a profit of €16.2 million in Q3 2025.
    • EMEA sales fell 11.5%, North America dropped 17.2%, while Asia-Pacific grew 10%.
View all signals for PUMA →

Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.

Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Brooks Running and PUMA share across the market ecosystem.

Get StartedBrooks Running ProfilePUMA Profile