AMCA

Private Equity, VC & Investor

Amber Capital vs Carlyle

Structured technology and market comparison · 2026

Direct Feature Comparison

Amber Capital · vs · Carlyle
Market Cluster / Sector
Amber CapitalPrivate Equity, VC & Investor
CarlylePrivate Equity, VC & Investor
Platform Focus
Amber Capital

European-focused alternative asset manager and activist investor.

Carlyle

Global alternative asset manager and private markets investor.

Company Size
Amber Capital10–49 employees
Carlyle1,001–5,000 employees
Headquarters
Amber CapitalGB
CarlyleUS
Year Founded
Amber Capital2005
Carlyle1987

Analyze all overlapping signals and tech stacks for Amber Capital and Carlyle

Compare mutual enterprise clients, monetization models, live market signals, and partner networks directly in the interactive Knowledge Graph.

Compare free in ExplorerFree · No credit card · 1-click via Google/LinkedIn

Comparison Analysis

What is the main difference between Amber Capital and Carlyle?

When comparing Amber Capital and Carlyle, both platforms operate within the Private Equity, VC & Investor ecosystem. Amber Capital is positioned as European-focused alternative asset manager and activist investor, whereas Carlyle focuses on Global alternative asset manager and private markets investor. Decision-makers evaluate both solutions when orchestrating their commercial monetization and technology stack.

What are the top alternatives to Amber Capital and Carlyle?

When evaluating Amber Capital and Carlyle, enterprise buyers also consider other platforms in Private Equity, VC & Investor. You can discover the full competitive landscape and evaluate other alternatives by viewing their respective footprint profiles on Polaris7.

How do the corporate scale, structure, and headquarters of Amber Capital and Carlyle compare?

Amber Capital is headquartered in GB (founded in 2005) with 10–49 employees. Carlyle is based in US (founded in 1987) with 1,001–5,000 employees. Complete ownership, subsidiary trees, and corporate affiliations are documented across Polaris7.

Market Signals

Recent Market Signals & Activity: Amber Capital vs Carlyle

Documented market movements, strategic partnerships, product releases, and regulatory developments mapped across Polaris7.

AM

Amber Capital

Recent Signals

No recent market signals documented for Amber Capital in the current tracking window.

CA

Carlyle

Recent Signals

  • ·SEC APIfinancials

    10-Q Financial Filing Analysis for Carlyle (2026-08-10)

    The Carlyle Group Inc. reported its second-quarter 2026 financial results, recording total revenues of $1,123.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, down from $1,572.9 million in the prior-year period. Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. stood at $137.1 million ($0.38 per basic share), compared to $319.7 million ($0.89 per basic share) in Q2 2025. For the six-month period, revenue fell to $1,377.5 million and net income dropped to $4.9 million, primarily driven by negative unrealized performance allocations of $(993.8) million (most notably from Carlyle Partners VII, L.P.). Recurring fund management fees demonstrated sustained resilience, increasing to $657.0 million in Q2 2026 ($1,241.0 million year-to-date), supported by strong fee-earning AUM across Global Credit and Carlyle AlpInvest.

    • Q2 2026 total revenues reached $1,123.5 million, with fund management fees contributing $657.0 million and net income attributable to Carlyle reaching $137.1 million ($0.37 diluted EPS).
    • Six-month 2026 net performance allocations declined to $(636.4) million due to unrealized valuation write-downs of $(993.8) million, driven significantly by Carlyle Partners VII, L.P.
    • Total balance sheet assets stood at $28,195.6 million as of June 30, 2026, with cash and cash equivalents of $1,256.5 million and corporate debt obligations of $2,998.8 million.
  • ·Retail-NewsM&A

    Very Group sale collapses as bids fall short of £2bn

    The planned sale of British online retailer The Very Group is on the verge of collapsing, as owner Carlyle fails to find a buyer willing to meet its minimum valuation of around £2 billion. According to Sky News, the sales process is likely to be abandoned. Carlyle took control in November 2025 as part of a financial restructuring, paying a nominal £1. Although a sales process was initiated, it was not a binding commitment. Potential bidders, including Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com and US investor Elliott Advisors, showed preliminary interest but did not submit offers at the desired level. The company has shown operational stability, with adjusted EBITDA up 15.9% to £307.1 million in FY2024/25, despite flat revenue. Carlyle is expected to retain ownership and focus on improving profitability and growth before potentially attempting another sale.

    • The Very Group's sale process is likely to be scrapped as bidders failed to meet the £2bn asking price.
    • Carlyle acquired The Very Group in November 2025 for a nominal £1 as part of a debt restructuring.
    • JD.com and Elliott Advisors were potential bidders but did not meet the valuation.

Compare their exact ecosystem overlaps.

Explore all deep relationships in Polaris7. Discover exactly which mutual clients, integrated technologies, and overlapping partners Amber Capital and Carlyle share across the market ecosystem.